Yikes! 8000 lbs of waste per house

An interesting article on the incredible amount of waste produced by home building and some tips on how to reduce it while saving money and building a better house.

According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) study, an estimated 8,000 lbs of waste is created from the construction of a 2,000 square foot home ... Much of the debris was either unnecessary material or material that could be salvaged or recycled.  The problem can be solved by streamlining the material coming into the construction site and better managing how the waste is separated and where it ends up.

(Via Jetson Green.)

Chicago Plans 1140 Acre LEED Neighborhood Development

From the Jetson Green weblog/magazine on green building:

Looks like Chicago city planners have big ideas for a 1140 acre swathe of land in South Chicago.  The spot is former U.S. Steel land, and planners have been mulling development options for the spot since about 2000.  Now, they'd like to submit a proposal for a green development with sustainable neighborhoods, green buildings, street cars, and bicycle paths, etc.  Officially referred to as the "South Chicago LEED Neighborhood Development Initiative," the plan would be rated by the USGBC's LEED-ND pilot program and would unravel over roughly 20-30 years. 

365 days of trash

So this guy, Dave Chameides, decided to keep all of his trash in the basement for a year and not throw anything out. And he has a family. Amazingly, he managed to keep his total trash down to 30.5 lbs plus recycling. It looks like he has a great blog with all kinds of inspiring tips on reducing your waste, and on more sustainable living in general. I like his byline: "noone can do everything but everyone can do something". Here's the video of the final result:


"Takin' Out The Trash" from Sustainable Dave on Vimeo.

A simple solar heater

Interesting piece on making a small solar heater out of 2x4's and pop-cans:

Insulating the garage would go a long way to help keep the bitter Vermont cold out, but that’s a project for another day. I decided instead to take advantage of the south-facing side of the garage and build a solar furnace to collect some of that sunshine just bouncing straight off my garage.

A 24 room, 344 square foot apartment

I'm not sure if this has anything to do with green building, but I think this one room apartment – described in a recent New York Times article – which can be transformed into 24 different rooms, from a kitchen to a spa to an entertainment room, is very interesting. This flexibility might find some traction with the "small house" movement:

This room -- the "maximum kitchen," he calls it -- and the "video game room" he was sitting in minutes before are just 2 of at least 24 different layouts that Mr. Chang, an architect, can impose on his 344-square-foot apartment, which he renovated last year. What appears to be an open-plan studio actually contains many rooms, because of sliding wall units, fold-down tables and chairs, and the habitual kinesis of a resident in a small space. As Mr. Chang put it, "I glide around."

Be sure to check out the photos if you follow the link through to the article.

(Via Kottke.)

The future of cars looks electric

From Wired:

"We're starting to see the path forward coalesce," says Aaron Bragman, an auto-industry analyst with IHS Global Insight. "They're all rallying around electric vehicles, and these aren't cars that are five or 10 years away. These cars are on production timelines."

Extended-range electric vehicles take us another big step away from petroleum. Cars ... use electricity to drive the wheels and a small internal combustion engine to recharge the battery as it approaches depletion ... eliminat[ing] the "range anxiety" that can make EVs a tough sell.

With the infrastructure already in place, battery-driven electric vehicles have a key advantage over their hydrogen fuel cell powered counterparts.

TIME waxes poetic on energy efficiency

Michael Grunwald in TIME on "America's Untapped Energy Resource: Boosting Efficiency":

This may sound too good to be true, but the U.S. has a renewable-energy resource that is perfectly clean, remarkably cheap, surprisingly abundant and immediately available.

This miracle juice goes by the distinctly boring name of energy efficiency, and it's often ignored in the hubbub over alternative fuels, the nuclear renaissance, T. Boone Pickens and the green-tech economy.

(Via Gristmill.)

Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security

Mark Jacobson provides an excellent overview and ranking of carbon-reducing energy technologies from solar to nuclear by their potential to positively affect the climate and air quality, their land-use impact, and their ability to supply sufficient energy to meet global demand. There is also an online presentation available with some useful graphics which summarizes the results.

Here is the take-home point for those who don't wish to read the whole article:

In summary, the use of wind, CSP, geothermal, tidal, solar, wave, and hydroelectric to provide electricity for BEVs and HFCVs result in the most benefit and least impact among the options considered. Coal-CCS and nuclear provide less benefit with greater negative impacts. The biofuel options provide no certain benefit and result in significant negative impacts. Because sufficient clean natural resources (e.g., wind, sunlight, hot water, ocean energy, gravitational energy) exists to power all energy for the world, the results here suggest that the diversion of attention to the less efficient or non-efficient options represents an opportunity cost that delays solutions to climate and air pollution health problems.

and here are a few choice quotes:

  • Globally, about 1700 TW (14900 PWh per year) of solar power are theoretically available over land for PVs ... the capture of even 1% of this power would supply more than the world's power needs.

  • [W]ind resources off the shallow Atlantic coast could supply a significant portion of US electric power on its own.

  • Converting to corn-E85 could cause either no change in or increase CO2 emissions by up to 9.1% ... Converting to cellulosic-E85 could change CO2 emissions by +4.9 to −4.9% relative to gasoline.

  • [I]nvestment in an energy technology with a long time between planning and operation increases carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions relative to a technology with a short time between planning and operation ... the delay permits the longer operation of higher-carbon emitting existing power generation, such as natural gas peaker plants or coal-fired power plants

(Via Gristmill.)

Wind power could meet global energy demand five times over

I was struck by the following statements in a GristMill article the other day:

Archer and Jacobson, perhaps the world's leading experts on wind potential, estimate that wind energy at 80 meters in commercially developable sites alone could supply five times the world's current energy demand ...

Is it power variability that worries experts? Jacobson and Archer have documented that connection via long distance transmission can reduce that variability.

Both of these statements run against the grain of what I understood to be the common sense notions (myths?) about the fallibility of wind power. Intrigued, I decided to look in more detail at what Archer and Jacobson had done to arrive at these conclusions.

The first of the two articles cited, an "Evaluation of global wind power"1, contains a detailed estimate of wind power availability from over 8000 measurement stations all over the world. Among these stations Archer and Jacobson found that 13% had an annual average wind speed greater than 6.9 m/s at a height of 80 m, meaning that these sites have a wind power class of 3 or greater2 as preferred for low-cost wind power generation. Areas of great wind power potential are found all over the world, and tend to be clustered along the coastlines of the continents. Interestingly, many of the most promising sites (of wind power class 7) are found on the east and west coasts, and in the Great Lakes region of Canada.

To calculate the global wind power availability Archer and Jacobson assume that global wind distribution is well mapped by the 8000+ measurement stations in their study, and hence that 13% of the earth's land area of 130 million square kilometres would have a wind power class of 3 or greater. They further assume that this land area could be covered by wind turbines at a density of 6 per square kilometre, with each turbine generating 720 kW of power (on average, as calculated from the wind speed data). Based on these numbers, they find that the global economically available wind power is approximately 72 TW (or 54 000 Mtoe3 per year). To put this in context, the global demand for electrical power in 2001 was in the range of 1.6-1.8 TW (14 - 15 x 1012 kWh per year) and the global demand for energy for all purposes for the year 2001 was 7-10 000 Mtoe. Cheap, readily available wind power alone could thus meet 40 times the 2001 global electricity use, and over five times the total energy use for all purposes.

Meeting global energy needs from wind power alone would require the installation of 20 million wind turbines over 16 million square kilometres (2.5% of the earth's land area), generating 15 TW of electrical power. To put this in context, the total installed wind capacity for the world was 94 GW in 2007 4, and it has been increasing by ~20 GW/year. In order to meet the global energy demand by the year 2050 through wind alone, approximately 370 GW or roughly 500 000 new wind turbines would need to be installed every year for the next forty years. It's time to get moving, but then we already knew that, didn't we.

One of the commonly expressed concerns with wind power is that the variability of wind makes it unreliable as a primary source of electrical power. In a 2007 article5, Archer and Jacobson examine one possible method for reducing the variability in the power generated: the interconnection of networks of wind farms over a large area. Because some wind turbines can be turning on one farm, even while they might not be on another some distance away, a network of wind farms is able to average out the peaks and troughs and deliver some level of stable power. By examining a network of 19 wind farms in the American mid-west, over an area spanning 850 km, Archer and Jacobson found that the interconnected wind farms could deliver guaranteed power of 222 kW/turbine at the same level of performance as a coal-powered generating station6. This means that as much as one-third of the total available wind power in the network could be used to supply reliable baseload electrical power, while the remaining, intermittent, two-thirds of the power could be used to, for example, charge batteries or generate hydrogen gas.

Taken together, these two articles strongly suggest that wind power alone could meet global electricity and energy needs, with room to spare. And that is reason for hope.

  1. Cristina L. Archer and Mark Z. Jacobson, J. Geophys. Res. 110, D12110 (2005).
  2. Wind power classes are linearly related to the power density of the wind at different wind speeds. See the AWEA Wind Energy FAQ for more information.
  3. Mtoe: Millon tonnes of oil equivalent.
  4. From the Wikipedia entry on Wind Power.
  5. Cristina L. Archer and Mark Z. Jacobson, J. Appl. Meteor. and Clim. 46, 1701 (2007).
  6. Interestingly, Archer and Jacobson also find that interconnecting the wind farms can allow for a reduction in the size of long-distance transmission lines carrying the electricity from the network to a city. Because some farms will have low wind speeds at any given point in time, the total capacity of the lines can be reduced without losing energy. This reduction would allow for the cheaper construction of long-distance transmission lines, thus making wind power even more economical.

Dangers of coal

Yikes! I hadn't been aware of this ugly aspect of coal-powered generation which has lead to the devastation of a large area in Tennessee:

United States coal plants produce 129 million tons of postcombustion byproducts a year, the second-largest waste stream in the country, after municipal solid waste. That is enough to fill more than a million railroad coal cars, according to the National Research Council.

Federal studies have long shown coal ash to contain significant quantities of heavy metals like arsenic, lead and selenium, which can cause cancer and neurological problems.

Passivhaus

The wonderful Passivhaus design gets a write-up in the New York Times:

The concept of the passive house, pioneered in this city of 140,000 outside Frankfurt, approaches the challenge from a different angle. Using ultrathick insulation and complex doors and windows, the architect engineers a home encased in an airtight shell, so that barely any heat escapes and barely any cold seeps in. That means a passive house can be warmed not only by the sun, but also by the heat from appliances and even from occupants' bodies.

And in Germany, passive houses cost only about 5 to 7 percent more to build than conventional houses.

"The myth before was that to be warm you had to have heating. Our goal is to create a warm house without energy demand," said Wolfgang Hasper, an engineer at the Passivhaus Institut in Darmstadt. "This is not about wearing thick pullovers, turning the thermostat down and putting up with drafts. It's about being comfortable with less energy input, and we do this by recycling heating."

Financing retrofits

Interesting post from the Gristmill on various strategies for financing high-efficiency retrofits of buildings with a long-term payback that might otherwise discourage short-term tenants. Manitoba Hydro is highlighted for its success in making 8,100 loans for energy conservation programs in 2007.

The lesson of Sacramento and Manitoba lies in that how payments are collected -- on the bill, on the property tax, or on a separate bill (which is what these programs do) -- matters less than how the loans are marketed. Because of humans' innate aversion to making complicated choices, among the most important ingredients of success in Manitoba and Sacramento is the deep and thoroughgoing involvement of those places' contractors -- the people that building owners already trust to help them improve their properties. In both places, contractors are the most important sales force and intermediary for the utility lending programs. Plus, these programs are efficient, well staffed and well organized. In Sacramento, once a contractor and building owner have submitted a loan application, the utility approves or declines within 24 hours. Manitoba is almost as fast, and it has a colossal network of engaged tradespeople: 1,100 contractors and 200 retailers are enrolled in its program. Manitoba has essentially deputized its building tradespeople as loan officers and conservation evangelists ... It's a whole-systems approach that provides financing as one part of the package.

Having faith

I read an article in the Toronto Star a while ago: "Mercury in fish brings warning". The article advises pregnant and nursing mothers against eating fish high in mercury, and it sparked something in me which I have been thinking about ever since I read Having Faith, by Sandra Steingraber, an ecologist who became pregnant with her first child at age 38. Over the course of her pregnancy, she undertook an exhaustive study of embryonic and fetal development, and the dangers posed to this development by environmental pollutants. After her baby, Faith, was born she spoke powerfully at the UN about the dangers of breast milk contamination. From this combination of personal experience and extensive research has sprung her book, Having Faith.

Sandra is a poetic writer, and her passages describing the biology of pregnancy can be achingly beautiful. The structure of the placenta growing into the walls of the uterus is compared to that of a maple grove: "by the third month of pregnancy, the treetops of an entire forest press up against the deepest layers of the womb ... it's canopy of placental branches ... pump[ing] much of what it needs out of the percolating raindrops of maternal blood." (31) Organogenesis, the differentiation of cells into body parts "sometimes ... seems like a magic show. At other times it's like origami, the formation of elegant structures from the folding of flat sheets. It also involves cellular wanderings worthy of Odysseus." (14) That this fantastical and delicate growth process - the formation of organs, fingers, toes, eyes, the growth of the brain -- is described in such elegant language, serves to make the main thrust of the book all the more potent. Sandra makes the cogent argument, backed up by a history of regulatory neglect (which has been countered by inspirational courageous action), that we are not doing enough to protect ourselves and our young ones from the potential ravages of environmental toxins. Toxins that have only passing, transient effects on fully grown adults can interfere with critical processes in fetal development by interrupting a delicate origami fold, or by tripping up an Odyssean nerve cell migrating through the young brain. Timing can be more critical than dose.

One issue her book addresses in detail is the danger posed to fetal brain development by exposure to methylmercury. Most mercury is released into the environment by the burning of coal in coal-fired power plants. From there, it makes it way into waterways, where tiny bacteria attach a carbon atom to mercury to make methylmercury. This methylmercury, released back into the water, attaches itself to tiny algae and plankton, which are then strained from the water by filter-feeders, in turn gobbled up by fish, and so on, up the food chain, in the usual process of biomagnification, to us.

Sadly, the passage of methylmercury is not blocked by the placental barrier. Sandra notes that "in the case of methylmercury the placenta functions more like a magnifying glass than a barrier." (34) It is for this reason that many public health organisations advise against the consumption of certain kinds of fish during pregnancy, especially the larger carnivores like shark, swordfish, and tuna. The good news is that avoiding fish can lower mercury levels in the body, as mercury only persists in human tissues for a few months. On the other hand, as Sandra points out,

an approach to fetal health that relies on nutritional sacrifices by the mother is still unsound. Cutting back on fish is not like cutting back on cigarettes and beer. Fish is good food ... the same succulent filet that carries fatty acids essential for brain growth also carry an injurious brain poison. (129)

Mercury concentrations in the atmosphere continue to rise, year over year, as new coal-powered generating plants are brought on line. Some would argue that taking action against climate change would harm the economies of the world by requiring the implementation of expensive measures to reduce emissions. It is becoming ever more clear that climate change is but one sign of many urging us to change our ways. This isn't economics, we're talking survival. We need to find ways to produce energy that do not pollute our environment and endanger the lives of our children. This world is all we have, and we are wholly dependent on its ecological health in ways so profound that they are almost beyond comprehension.

Fortunately, there are encouraging signs of change. Some jurisdictions are starting to take action against mercury contamination and against persistent organic pollutants. California has recently announced a commitment to a 25% reduction in greenhouse gases. The "Precautionary Principle" is starting to take hold in some parts of the world. We need to continue to support such efforts and encourage our politicians to focus their efforts on cleaning up the planet. In closing, I would like to quote Sandra, who at the end of her book writes

May the world's feast be made safe for women and children.
May mother's milk run clean again.
May denial give way to courageous action.
May I always have faith. (283)

Consider the refrigerator

Very encouraging. Steven Chu, the next Secretary of Energy in the US, on energy efficiency in the New Yorker:

"the manufacturers had to assign the job to the engineers, instead of to the lobbyists." ... the size of the average American refrigerator has increased by more than ten per cent, while the price, in inflation-adjusted dollars, has been cut in half. Meanwhile, energy use has dropped by two-thirds.

The transition to more efficient fridges, Chu pointed out, has saved the equivalent of all the energy generated in the United States by wind turbines and solar cells. "I cannot impress upon you how important energy efficiency is," he said.

Will science be part of the green jobs push?

Great post from Andrew Revkin in the New York Times Dot Earth blog today in which he argues for a major boost in R&D spending on green technology:

I'm not quite sure I've heard any leader yet describe the sustained, aggressive "energy quest" that'd be required to lead the world toward a future with non-polluting energy choices sufficient to empower more or less 9 billion people -- and how that quest would have to extend from the living room to the boardroom, from the laboratory to the classroom, to be transformational ...

Will the push for a green economy include a boost for those priming the innovation pump?

William McDonough

In this fascinating and moving speech1 William McDonough, the author of "Cradle to Cradle", condemns our "de facto plan" in which we measure

prosperity by how much of your natural capital you can cut down, dig up, bury, burn or otherwise destroy, … productivity by how few people are working, progress by your number of smokestacks,

and offers us this new design assignment:

How do we love all the children of all species for all time?

He challenges us to reach for a triple top line of environment, equity and economy, and to reinvent our industrial systems with "Cradle to Cradle" design in which waste from one process becomes food for another and in which the production and use of toxic chemicals is anathema.

William McDonough has been hailed as a visionary, and in 1996 was the recipient of the Presidential Award for Sustainable Development. As is often the case, it may be that the man behind the ideas is not entirely who he seems to be. I don't think this should detract from the power of the ideas2; it may diminish the power of the messenger.

  1. There is also a shorter 20 minute version of the same speech available from TED Talks.
  2. The 'hit' article on William McDonough mentions GreenBlue, a non-profit organization founded by McDonough that has put together a Sustainable Packaging Coalition; and also SMaRT for Sustainable Materials Rating Technology, a comprehensive green technology standard that has been picked up by, for example, the USGBC for LEED credits.

Amory Lovins on energy efficiency

These five videos show Amory Lovins, founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, giving a lecture series on Advanced Energy Efficiency as the MAP/Ming Visiting Professor at Stanford University in 2007. The lectures are delivered in typical Amory style, peppered with numeric detail, filled with inspiring examples of green design, and bursting with information. I highly recommend watching all five if you have time. Higher quality versions are also available on iTunes.

Hope

This is a piece I wrote for my old web site a few years back. It's still relevant to my outlook today, and I'll be expanding on this hopeful theme of focusing on solutions to environmental crises in future entries to come, so I thought it would make a good launching point for this blog.

This entry is about hope; a celebration of human creativity. We need hope. Human society faces many challenges. People are outstripping the ability of the earth to replenish itself and are dumping tonnes of toxic materials into the land, air and water. The rapid release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is causing global warming1 and acidifying the oceans2.

There are many who argue that the gap between the problems that humanity faces and the solutions to these problems is too great, that it is beyond our ingenuity. The research I have done on sustainability tells a different story. All over the world, people are (re)learning how to build homes and buildings that are environmentally sustainable and energy neutral. Many of these techniques draw on ancient knowledge that has been neglected in recent decades: the use of straw-bale, cob (mud and straw), adobe, etc. as building materials; the application of simple structural design principles to encourage the passive cooling and heating of buildings; the resurrection of the wind mill to harvest energy from the air. Many of these techniques draw on new technologies: solar cells which generate electricity from sunlight; water circulation for heating and cooling and for providing a large 'thermal mass'; highly-efficient windows to trap the heat that sunlight can pour into a building; geothermal heating and cooling.

We do, of course, use energy beyond that used to support a comfortable living environment. Recent advances in many sustainable energy technologies promise to satisfy much of this demand through the delivery of energy from the sun, wind, waves, tides, and vegetation. Fusion remains a distinct, if seemingly ever-distant, possibility. It is my belief that the solution to many of our problems lies both in the pursuit of new scientific or technological modalities and in the implementation of existing technologies to save vast amounts of wasted energy, and provide sources of energy that do not overburden the earth. We need only divert a fraction of the money and resources poured into oil extraction, nuclear fission (which arguably carries too many environmental and geo-political dangers to be viable in the long term) and war-mongering toward sustainable energy modalities to realize a revolution in our global energy economy.

That so many solutions lie within our grasp gives me hope that people can start to turn this mess around. It won't be easy, but it is possible.

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: www.ipcc.ch.
  2. Ken Caldeira and Micheal E. Wickett, "Oceanography: Anthropogenic carbon and oceanic pH", Nature 425, 365 (23 September 2003).